Go Back   SFX > SFX > PC and video games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17-03-2012, 06:43 PM
napoleon napoleon is offline
Owner Of A Lonely Heart
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 49
Default Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

I wondered if any gamesplayers actually purchase every title in a long-running franchise which produces a new game every year?

Here I am talking mainly about sports simulations, such as FIFA and PES, as well as FOOTBALL MANAGER etc.

Can the companies creating these games really justify a few tweaks and player changes as an excuse to bring out a new title displaying the current year? Perhaps releasing a cheaper data disc or downloadable content would be a better idea instead?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-03-2012, 06:51 PM
Knappos's Avatar
Knappos Knappos is offline
Sentinel Of The Solar System
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southampton/Firmly in the 616
Posts: 1,991
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

I used to get the WWE Smackdown/Smackdown vs Raw gaems fairly regularly but haven't bought one in 3/4 years.

I got tired, like you say, of minor tweeks that don't change a lot and changes that defied the 'if it aint broke..' rule.
__________________
Knappos, if you can't suspend disbelief I will stretch the very boundaries of pedantics to fill the gaps.

"There is a man. With a type writer. This is all his twisted imagination."

"Reverse the jelly baby of the neutron flow"

"She bought my ignorance with baked goods"

"Don't tell me you're still on Myspace." "We're more Ceefax people."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-03-2012, 10:25 PM
Aeyjay Aeyjay is offline
Sentinel Of The Solar System
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,740
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

the ea sports ones are the worst . you're basically paying full price for a roster update. Madden being the worst culprit .
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-03-2012, 01:16 AM
James Ormiston's Avatar
James Ormiston James Ormiston is online now
Master Of The Universe
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hitchin, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,913
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

Depends on the game I think. Assassin's Creed has probably pulled it off, though it's definitely time to move on from Ezio now, and 3 years between 2 and 3 would have been a bit of a wait.

Never been into sports games, but it's always struck me that they should only really bring out a game every few years, and keep them fresh with DLC, rather than buying pretty much the same game year on year.

Some games I wish were annual, but it's probably for the best that they're not, I want more Portal!
__________________
"People and planets and stars will become dust, and the dust will become atoms and the atoms will become... nothing"
"Your tongues can't repel flavor of that magnitude!"
"I don't want to go"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-03-2012, 09:32 AM
Ed the Head's Avatar
Ed the Head Ed the Head is offline
Master Of The Universe
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Where the dead ships dwell
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

I used to buy Tiger Woods golf every year.I stopped a while back but bought The Masters 2012 as it was PSMove compatible.
__________________
"I think i liked you better when you just hit people with your stick"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-03-2012, 11:44 AM
deGooder's Avatar
deGooder deGooder is offline
Eternal Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Durham
Posts: 5,448
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

Depends on each game. The last three Fifa installments had made big strides for the previous entry in terms of both the core mechanics and game modes available.

It is possible to introduce the new modes via DLC but no way you be unable to re-write the underlying game mechanices in an update.

Football Manager also tends to introduce a significant change each time round, although the changes last time round were mostly in the back engine so not immediately obvious. I think the COD games are one of the worst in this regard in the last few years.

It is true that sometimes the yearly release add little to the existing package but publishers release them because they know it will sell. Think of them as the blockbuster films that generate revenue to spend on creating the risker ventures.
__________________
Our Front Room
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-03-2012, 01:23 AM
Charlie Charlie is offline
Sentinel Of The Solar System
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,259
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

I am still playing FM2009, in year 2061. I see the updates each year, and all they seem to do is fiddle with training and media. I am too into my teams, and dont want to quit yet.

One thing that would get me to buy is an option to upgrade your save to the new game, and considering the databases are not that different, I am sure it would not be that hard to implement.

I had bought every version of FM/CM until FM2009, right back to the original on the Amiga, where all of the players were made up, and you had to wait ages between matches for the vidiprinter to calculate the results.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2012, 04:09 PM
napoleon napoleon is offline
Owner Of A Lonely Heart
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 49
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

Talking of the AMIGA, my favourite football game of them all on that machine was undoubtedly PLAYER MANAGER 2 by ANCO. I literally spent days playing that game and, once my character had hung up his boots due to age, continued for many, many more seasons.

Although there was the choice of taking control of players during the matches, I must confess that I was never the greatest player, so simply watched the computer team instead.

Although rather simplistic compared to modern management simulations, the game was very easy to play and I liked the (now standard) idea of players maturing over time until they retired and new (younger) faces brought in as replacements, ensuring a constantly changing team.

On the PC, my favourite football game was LMA MANAGER 2005 but it sadly does not work on my new machine which is why I purchased FOOTBALL MANAGER 2009.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2012, 05:36 PM
Sleep2Deep Sleep2Deep is offline
King Of The World
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 56
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

The only yearly update I seem to buy is fifa, (regular, not manager). Sometimes its quite a good change, fifa 12 seems to have really tightened dribbling nicely, and introduced the new defending mechanic rather than just automatic pressing all of the time.

I agree that a lot of yearly releases are just team roster updates and maybe a bit of polish in a few areas, but fifa is my relaxation game and I easily get my value for money out of it. Thats the thing that matters to me in the end
__________________
My Horror fiction and Dark Review blog : http://caseydouglass.blogspot.co.uk/

My Twitter : @Casey_Douglass
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:39 PM
Saul Iscariot Saul Iscariot is offline
Guardian Of The Galaxy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lost his way following a star.
Posts: 2,241
Default Re: Yearly franchise titles - Good or bad?

I've never been one for the sort of game that gets a yearly update like your FIFA's. I have FIFA 11 for my nephew and family members, last FIFA game before that was on the N64. I'm not opposed to yearly updates, I'm just not a fan of the sort of game that gets them. If LoZ was released annually to the same quality I expect of the series I'd be happy.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.