|
Feedback on the new season of Dollhouse has not been overwhelmingly positive so far. There is no UK broadcaster announced yet for the show. If you haven't been following it at US pace, let blogger Jamie Starbuck put it in perspective for you:
Living doll?
Ever seen an Eskimo fish for seals? They'll cut a hole in the ice and wait. And wait. And wait a bit more. Eventually, a seal will come up for air and BAM! Bye bye Sammy Seal. Eskimos do this a lot thus proving they have massive amounts of endurance and patience.
They should try watching Dollhouse. I you don't know (where ya been?), Dollhouse is a Joss Whedon creation. When it was first announced the internet went into meltdown and before almost any details were known, a campaign to save the programme from cancellation was born. There have been rumours aplenty about the quality (there were reshoots demanded by Fox) and even Joss Whedon himself said the show only really gets going after the first few episodes are out of the way. The programme itself concerns Echo (Eliza Dushku) as an “Active” who regularly gets her memories wiped and then replaced with those of numerous other people so she can go on exciting missions - like being a prostitute or an extreme sports fan - where she gets to show a lot of flesh for the people willing to pay for her services. Or, more accurately, pay the people that effectively own Echo; for, while she's not on a mission she's effectively just.... well, blank.
Two episodes in and I can't bear to watch any more. Leaving aside the moral implications of the premise it's one mess of a show. I don't care if it picks up after episode three or four. If at the end of the season lots of people say "you know, it started out awful but got to Alias/24/pick-your-own-favourite levels of excitement by season’s end" then I'll revisit it. The reasons it's poor at the moment are many: bad acting, woeful scripts, an illogical and ineptly implemented premise, boring direction and a level of stupidity that Smallville would be proud of to name but a few.
The second episode had ratings 15% down on the already poor first week's. The cancellation clock is ticking ever louder and even the Eskimos have gone to do something else more productive.
This is the personal opinion of Jamie Starbuck, one of our new volunteer bloggers, who'll begin contributing regularly from later in the month. Read more about some of our contributors in the next issue of SFX, on sale Wednesday 11 March.
Remember, we put up an interview with Eliza Dushku about this last week. Are you following Dollhouse? Are you a Whedon fan looking forward to what he does with this concept in future episodes? Comments below, ladies and gents…
|
Posted by justrobby (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 02:08 PM GMT
Website: http://www.notjustmovies.net #
I watched the first episode online and haven't watched anymore because i can't see it lasting. Not because it isn't good, i like it, i like it too much. But i've had my heart broken by good shows cancelled before their time before and can't take it anymore.
Its idiotic reviews like this that ruin TV shows. Most shows aren't that great to start with. hell, most of Buffy season one wasn't up to much. Dollhouse as the opportunity to do something new and different, but people like this Jamie idiot aren't even giving it a chance, yeah that'll help the show succeed!
I would like to know what problem they have with the premise, it makes sense, the perfect soldier capable of learning and knowing anything and they won't remember doing it which means they're perfect for 'delicate' missions. So what if there's moral implications, Firefly was about a bunch of criminals. Some one please rethink the hiring of this person, seriously their opinion is valid but the reasons are idiotic and frankly make little to no sense.
Posted by richard casey (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 04:33 PM GMT #
You see the issues some of the team have regarding the dolls and how their obviously uncomfortable with the idea and the suggestion that there is someone (possibly the escaped doll) who knows about the house and has an agenda of their own regarding its destruction.
Reading the above review I doubt the writer even watched the second episode as no references as to what he objected to are made in the article. I see a lot of potential in this series and if it starts revealing a bit more about the threat to the house people will soon get hooked.
Posted by Garry (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 04:53 PM GMT #
Posted by Alobar (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 06:10 PM GMT #
And no Dollhouse is not a great show so far but it has some signs that it could be a heck more.
Posted by mark van Vollenhoven (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 07:57 PM GMT #
Posted by John Hughes-Kelly (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 09:04 PM GMT #
O.K Miss Duckshoe couldn't act her way out of a paperbag. The premise is very silly and it's basically a high tech version of Band of Gold. But it's got something watchable about it at the moment. Yes there are big masseeve obvious WTF moments, but at two episodes I don't expect for it all to make sense yet. There is something there that I can't put my finger on that tells me that it will make sense. Might be wrong, but hey I'm willing to give it a couple more episodes to find out.
Posted by darrenmdr (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 09:51 PM GMT #
Posted by eocine (127.0.0.1) on February 25, 2009 at 10:45 PM GMT #
Read: Conservative (possibly unimaginative and boring) parents inviting a wayward (yet intelligent, liberal, troublesome and unconventional) child back into the fold until they fear their societal reputation will be tarnished by his imagination and they kick him out of the familial house.
Again...
and again...
ad infinitum.
(we all read how the pilot was reshot according to demands by the parents)
Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 12:31 AM GMT #
Guess I shall just be that eskimo waiting patiently for the seal that probably won't come until the final episode.
Posted by rocksolidhair (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM GMT #
Posted by OMG!!! (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 07:58 AM GMT #
Read: Forgiving, and generous parents inviting a unimaginative, prententious self centred child back into the fold until he messes the house up again with another pile of garbage and they have to get the fumingators in to clean up the stinking mess and they kick him out of the house once again.
Again...
and again...
Let's hope this time they don't invite him back.
Posted by Lames (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 08:07 AM GMT #
Posted by alex (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 09:04 AM GMT #
However, the second episode was a riot of action and storyline. The mere glimpse of a 'composite event' is enough to assure me that this series will not just be about whoring out people unable to protest.
In reaction to this Jamie guy all I have to say that every story has a beginning and at least it 'sounds' like fox are giving it more of a chance than they did Firefly (which I only saw after the fact and loved it). The review posted is in no way impartal and only looks at one side - its basically a rant and no-one likes to listen to strangers rant.
Posted by Josh (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 01:14 PM GMT #
This blogger is of course entitled to his opinion though, as we all are, however as a source for whats going on in the world of sci-fi I would have expected sfx to select bloggers based on there ability to evaluate assess and communicate effectively in context to what its readers want to know, not just as a soap box for what they want to ramble on about, good or bad….if I want that I can go to you tube.
Posted by Dan (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 03:40 PM GMT #
Posted by John Hughes-Kelly (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 07:42 PM GMT #
Dollhouse seems to be polarising opinion doesn't it? It all makes for very good internetering.
Josh - If no-one wanted to to listen to strangers rant no blog would ever get read.
Dan - As a "reader" what would you like to be reading about?
Proper Dave - listen to Alex. Giz a job!
Yours, with darrenmdr's nobs on
J
Posted by Jamie Starbuck (127.0.0.1) on February 26, 2009 at 08:32 PM GMT #
2 episodes in, I'm not ready to write this show off yet. Not by a long shot.
Posted by DarthHoob (127.0.0.1) on February 27, 2009 at 01:05 AM GMT #
Jamie- As a reader of a blog i look for clarity in purpose, whether it be as a personal diary or as a commentary on a subject.
If it is a diary go ahead and tell it as you see it, however i find it hard to assume that is the case for a blogger high profile/brand website blog, and this being the case find little other than a lambaste of the subject, which in my opinion doesn't promote constructive discussion or contribution for your readers.
Such a media, I feel, would benefit from critique over straight criticism if this doesn't occur we are left with a "what is the point" feeling. In this i agree with previous poster Josh, who raised a valid point that (if i may be permitted to translate into the context i am talk of), if someone is stood a on a box ranting without being mindful, constructive or providing analysis, they will remain just a crazy guy that people will just walk past shaking there heads at...
But i will leave it there in fear of derailing the blog for Dollhouse, instead of just arguing "what a blog should be".
Just my opinions
Posted by Dan (127.0.0.1) on February 27, 2009 at 10:06 AM GMT #
The problem with a blog is that the writer is inviting the general (rabid) internet viewing public into listening to his opinions. I barely care about my friends opinions never mind some 'internet loon' (if you'll pardon the phrase).
Think it all comes down to the fact we are just at the beginning of the story and I wait with baited breath for more. I want to watch as the story and characters grow and develop, personally that is part of the enjoyment in watching a series rather than a movie (stealing one of Dan's points).
Otherwise we'll just have to put it down to a difference of opinions - on a great, many things :P
Posted by Josh (127.0.0.1) on February 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM GMT #
Posted by Neaera (127.0.0.1) on March 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM GMT #