SFX
SFX Merchandise
Newsletter

20090506 Wednesday May 06, 2009

FILM REVIEW: X-Men Origins: Wolverine

12A • 107 mins • 29 April

Director: Gavin Hood

Cast: Hugh Jackman, Liev Schreiber, Danny Huston

Rating:

X-Men Origins: Wolverine proves a more memorable scandal than a screen experience.

A notorious leaked workprint turned it into a poster child for torrent culture, a Hollywood flashpoint that coincided with the takedown of Pirate Bay and ensured a level of media chatter that this middling, auto-piloted piece of superhero cinema could never have won on its own.

It plays the voguish prequel card, of course, and is clearly a stab at resurrecting Fox’s tentpole franchise after Brett Ratner’s dreary X3 murdered the mutant cash cow. But while Bond, Batman and Star Trek profited from a Year Zero makeover, Wolverine restores no such energy to the dwindling X-universe – indeed, its aura of imaginative bankruptcy actively saps it, making this more dead end than new dawn.

There’s a flutter of promise in the first reel. We see Wolverine on a black-ops mission in Lagos, a dank, dark jungle locale that delivers an invigorating new environment for this kind of fare. There’s bristling macho interplay and genuine wit and for a brief, shining moment you’re convinced this will play like a parahuman take on The Dirty Dozen. No such joy. We’re soon mired in a predictable tale of revenge, an escalating series of empty tragedies occurring to half-sketched characters that ultimately packs all the emotional resonance of a night on the Xbox.

Technically, it’s debatable as to whether this even qualifies as a Wolverine solo movie. The criminally clumsy title anchors it to the established Marvel franchise while the poster explicitly positions him as a team player, flanked by mutant co-stars. Liev Schreiber brings weapons-grade charisma to the talon-fingered Sabretooth (a strange retro-fit with the shaggy wrestler we saw in Bryan Singer’s X-Men) but the shameless parade of such four-colour faves as Gambit, Deadpool, Cyclops, the Blob and Emma Frost feel like sops to the fanboy faithful, an insurance policy to woo the geek vote. Shame they feel like shadows of their comic book counterparts.

And who, precisely, is Hugh Jackman playing? It’s certainly not the bruising, hellraising runt of the comic books. Scarily ripped he may be, but there’s an inescapable leading man quality to Jackman, a hint of Barbara Cartland and Broadway that’s at odds with the essential rogue spirit of Wolverine. They camouflaged this in the X-movies by granting him all the snarky comebacks. Here he’s burdened with the straight man gig, and for all his muscles and snarl he seems fundamentally decent, even Eagle Scoutish (there’s an odd interlude with a Ma and Pa Kent styled couple that adds a wildly inappropriate echo of the Superman origin myth). Berserker rage be damned - you can easily imagine him fretting over whether he should take the last pink wafer on the plate.

Arthouse helmer Gavin Hood summons some moments of beauty from his New Zealand palette but comes unstuck with the superheroics. The film has an underbudgeted vibe – from the sets to Wolverine’s woeful claw FX – and there’s a perfunctory feel to the combat set-pieces, including a climax atop the nuclear towers of Three Mile Island. Mix with trite, declamatory dialogue and Hood’s tendency to reach for a vapid visual and you have an aching mess of superficial bad-assery.

Ironically, there’s a glimpse of a truly great Wolverine movie tucked away in the title sequence. A Watchmen-styled montage showcases the claw-slashing immortal in tumbling decades of global warfare, battling from the trenches of the Great War to the beaches of Normandy to the hell of ‘Nam. It’s coiled, brutal, stylish, thrilling – and ultimately an almighty pricktease of adventures you’d rather be watching.

Nick Setchfield

Advertisement
Trackback URL:
Comments:

so... you liked it. Right?

Posted by Mischa Welsh (127.0.0.1) on May 06, 2009 at 06:07 PM BST #

I agree with everything in this review.... BAR teh three stars! Seriously, how bad does a film have to be to get one or two stars?

Posted by 127.0.0.1 on May 06, 2009 at 08:14 PM BST #

3 stars is that all i loved every minute of it,i would give it 5 stars,looking forward to see what yo give the new STAR TREK Movie.you are way to critical.

Posted by David (127.0.0.1) on May 06, 2009 at 08:45 PM BST #

I have to agree with this. The film just wasn't the kick ass piece of superhero fun I was looking forward to. And considering Wolverine comes on the heels of last years Ironman and Incredible Hulk films we are talking major disappoinment here. And did they really need the Prof X scene? Hopefully the post credits scene means in the sequel we're going to be in Japan and fighting the hand. Seeing Wolvie go hand to sword with samurai could, nay should, be the fun trip all x-men and Wolverine fans the world over wanted from this film.

Posted by Rick (127.0.0.1) on May 06, 2009 at 09:36 PM BST #

Sometimes, I'm glad I'm not a comic book fan.

I was able to see it purely as a movie fan and enjoyed it on the whole.

Not sure why Fat B&stard was in it though.
That was like it belonged in a different film!

Betten than Xmen 3 but not as good as X2 for my money. I'd give it three stars too.

Posted by Hugh Jass (127.0.0.1) on May 06, 2009 at 09:39 PM BST #

I saw Wolverine last Wednesday and while I will agree it's not 100% perfect it is still an enjoyable popcorn film. Ok so die hard fanboys will be up in arms over the changes to his origin, it pretty much ditches it after the opening sequence in favour of a more crowd pleasing bromance/romance/revenge/tragedy/double bluff/'lets set up a sequel' kind of movie, but it has some good action sequences, sexy eye candy and some competent performances from Jackman, Schreiber and Hutson.

I too consider myself to be a die hard Wolverine fanboy and although I would have prefered to have seen a 15+ movie with more slicing and dicing and less cameo appearances from Gambit (completely pointless in this movie) and Blob (meant to be funny but as Hugh Jass says looks like he stepped out of Austin Powers), in the end I'm just happy that I got another chance to see "the best there is at what he does" even if what he does isn't as good as I'd hoped.

Maybe with Wolvie 2 Jackman will correct his mistakes and pull a kick ass film out of the bag, after all 'X-Men' isn't as good as 'X2' (which this film really should have been) but now that Wolverine's pre X-Men world is set up who knows where we could go. My only hope is next time they'll take more care with the story and only include characters that progress the plot.

Posted by Pete (127.0.0.1) on May 06, 2009 at 10:10 PM BST #

Better than the last X-Men film.
Patrick Stewart looked a little bit...weird

Posted by Ben Hazuki (127.0.0.1) on May 06, 2009 at 10:14 PM BST #

yup, disappointed with the result of this movie, although there are glimpses of what this film should have been, the story just panders to the wider audience way too much. Schreiber was good, needed more hair though & Reynolds was totally wasted,(good luck with the solo Deadpool movie).
Jackman was average, he didn't show us the goods that were on offer in X-Men and X2. Three stars, totally..bub.

Posted by dexx Wreck'em (127.0.0.1) on May 07, 2009 at 06:56 AM BST #

I thought Wolverine would be like this. Another "lets whack as many X-men in a film for no reason what so ever" type thing.

Why is Cyclops even in this movie? It makes no sense! And if this is a prequal to the original trilogy then why doesn't he recognise Logan when he turns up in the first X-men movie? Stupid, just stupid.

Posted by Mr Kleason (127.0.0.1) on May 07, 2009 at 09:16 AM BST #

Mr Kleason: He didn't recognise him cos he couldn't see him, he was blindfolded.

I was actually bored at parts of this film. I maybe alone here but I enjoyed X3 a lot more than this turgid rubbish.

Posted by TomBobBill (127.0.0.1) on May 07, 2009 at 09:39 AM BST #

X-3 kinda ruined one of my favourite X Men stories so I'm not a big fan of it. But Wolverine bored me in places I was a bit disappointed but it's still a pretty fun film.

Posted by Ben Hazuki (127.0.0.1) on May 07, 2009 at 11:28 PM BST #

It was okay as a movie but as a true to the comics movie it was awful . and did anybody pick up on the wepon x program takin less than a couple of minutes and was alot less scary / brutal than it looked in X2

Posted by 127.0.0.1 on May 09, 2009 at 11:57 AM BST #

This was awful. Totally cringeworthy.

It failed dismally on every single level. Even Jackman was poor and I thought that would be impossible for him as Logan/Wolverine.

It was like the film makers were trapped in a bad 1980's actioner. My friend leant over half way through it and whispered, "This is Commando...only worse!" He was right.

A rubbish story, corny dialogue, poor acting, a tone that's about as weighty as an episode of The A Team and lots of schockingly bad fx. Wolverine has been well and truly de-clawed.

Utter garbage.

Posted by 127.0.0.1 on May 09, 2009 at 07:57 PM BST #

not too bad for plot and lets face it had to be better then x men, 1, 2 and 3 but i cant beleive nobody checked it before release the special effects are terrible honest i've seen better graphics in eastenders

Posted by gavin (127.0.0.1) on May 11, 2009 at 05:57 PM BST #

I really enjoyed this movie, despite the plotholes, the way the (mis)used Gambit, and the so-so ending. It was far from perfect, but nowhere as bad as X3.

Posted by Marcel van Driel (127.0.0.1) on May 12, 2009 at 09:26 AM BST
Website: http://www.marcelvandriel.nl #

The film was ok, but it could have been so much better. They really needed to chop down the character and give Deadpool and Gambit more screen Time. The bloke who played Gambit was ok in the first few minets of seeing him, he was all grin and cold shoulder. As much I though 'he can't do that, he's ment to throw them' the car launching thing was pretty cool. It was only when he went outside that he turned into an anoying teenager, who was from NEW ORLEANS!!!! ARggg, what ever happened to the Rangin' Cajan, still Ryan Reynolds was fab. I can't wait for the Deadpool movie, I think Ryan is properly involved with it, so it's stay true to the comics.

Posted by Liam (127.0.0.1) on May 18, 2009 at 07:00 PM BST #

That felt like a two-star review.

(And I agree on the credits - they're great, and it's all downhill from there.)

Posted by Craig Oxbrow (127.0.0.1) on May 20, 2009 at 12:54 AM BST #

I agree with the three stars, though i would give it even less.
The ridiculous use of the "holding my dead lover while the camera moves up and out while I do some over dramatic yelling" shot almost killed me. And they did it TWICE! ... horrible...
And, of course, the complete butchering of Gambit. Casting: maybe ok(ish). Point of being in plot: ....none
Lets not even get started on the horrific CGI. (80's quality indeed)
Easily the worst of the X-Men franchise, beating out X3 by a mile.

Posted by 127.0.0.1 on May 28, 2009 at 08:32 AM BST #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
SFX Movie Trailers

Calendar