SFX
SFX Merchandise
Newsletter

20090617 Wednesday June 17, 2009

FILM REVIEW: Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen

12A • 150 mins • 19 June

Director: Michael Bay

Cast: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, John Turturro, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Ramon Rodriguez, Rainn Wilson, Isabel Lucas

Rating:

For years Michael Bay’s been aspiring to take cinema to a place where action is punctuated as rarely as possible by those pesky talky bits. With his big, loud and slightly nonsensical Transformers sequel he’s taken his quest to its logical conclusion. This is effectively one big, two-and-a-half-hour-long set-piece.

From a Shanghai-based mash-up that out-bangs the first movie’s finale, through to a robot rumble in tourist-friendly sight of the pyramids of Giza, there’s barely time to catch your breath, let alone think. This film is so eager to give your senses a pummelling that come the end, your mind is completely anaesthetised to the outside world.

The story is something of an afterthought, which is a shame, considering that, for all its crazy excess, the first Transformers did at least have a clear beginning, middle and end. Here the plot doesn’t so much unfold as materialise from the ether. New robot characters appear from nowhere, key plot points slip in and out of the movie on a whim – you’re often left thinking “so what happened to [insert relevant item]?”– and inescapable situations are frequently resolved by revealing a convenient new piece of Transformer technology.

In the tradition of blockbuster sequels, the bywords here are “bigger, faster, more intense”. It’s now three years since the events of the original movie, and Optimus Prime and his Autobot buddies – their ranks now swelled by a few new robots in disguise – are working with the US government to track down and eliminate rogue Decepticons. Unfortunately for Prime and co, Megatron’s lackeys are working overtime to prepare for the return of the Fallen, an ancient robot Lucifer who’s like the Emperor to Megatron’s Darth Vader (contrary to reports, Megatron is in the movie, his watery grave revealed to the Decepticons by a piece of expositionary dialogue so shameless that all involved should have been sent back to film school).

As you’d expect, the robots look fantastic. ILM’s effects have moved on even since their groundbreaking work on the first movie, and their giant shapeshifting machines are so integrated with the real world that you feel Michael Bay just picked up a camera and shot them. Even so, you can’t help feeling that less could have been more. Aside from the colourful Optimus Prime, Bumblebee and newbie Autobot comic relief/annoyances The Twins, there are so many identikit, silvery Transformers that they blur into one, many of them glimpsed so fleetingly – a couple die in the opening salvo – that their only reason for existence is as an excuse to sell toys. Had Bay cut the roll call back a bit, they might have been characters rather than flag-bearers for CGI. The one Bot to emerge with personality intact is curmudgeonly geriatric Decepticon turncoat Jetfire, a creaky British-accented misanthrope whose utterance of the word “bollocks” is almost worth the admission by itself.

However, Bay’s no longer just about machines. These days he has a new fixation in the shapely form of Megan Fox. The first movie’s infamous car repair scene opened some major floodgates, and now the director never misses an opportunity to get his starlet du jour running in slow motion, pouting at the camera or provocatively removing bits of clothing. You’re looking at the fine line where modelling meets acting.

If Megan Fox’s attributes are used to the max – she’s so alluring that even robots try humping her leg – her co-star/love interest Shia LaBeouf is somewhat wasted. Made miserable, Luke Skywalker-style, by the weight of the world on his shoulders, Sam Witwicky’s fast-talking wit doesn’t appear much beyond the first act. Instead, the lion’s share of the comedy falls to John Turturro’s bitter ex-government agent and Sam’s irritating new college roommate Leo (The Wire’s Ramon Rodriguez).

Like the movie as a whole, the results are inconsistent. By turns Revenge Of The Fallen is spectacular, funny, cringeworthy, edge-of-the-seat exciting, tedious, incomprehensible, dumb and very occasionally smart – sometimes all at the same time. Unfortunately, there isn’t room for everything Bay wants to do in 150 minutes, leaving you wondering why he couldn’t have saved something for a part three. It’s not like any force in the world, robot or human, is going to stop it from happening.

Richard Edwards

Advertisement
Trackback URL:
Comments:

Yikes! This is the second poor review I've read but it's not putting me off seeing the film. I enjoyed the first movie and while the Transformers series will probably never be considered Oscar worthy they're fun enteraining popcorn fluff and nothing excites me more than the sight of giant robots beating the tar out of each other.

Posted by Pete (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 05:12 PM BST #

Can't. Resist. Giant. Robots. And. Excessive. Bayhem.....

Posted by Dawfydd (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 05:45 PM BST #

Richard Edwards.

Obviously more of a Gobots fan.

I'll wait and see it myself before getting worked up about the bad vibes.

Posted by Son Of Solo (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 06:44 PM BST #

Let's be honest though, a Transformers movie isn't what you go and see if you're looking for something intellectually stimulating.

I'm quite looking forward to seeing it. Nothing like some giant robot Bayhem to lighten my mood.

Posted by Hal (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 07:02 PM BST #

First one was shite - can't imagine that this will be much better!

Posted by John Purnell (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 07:27 PM BST #

Sounds like fun!

Posted by Poekie Poek (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 09:16 PM BST #

So, judging by the previous 'ok' write up of the god-awful wolverine, and the 'must try harder' review of terminator, this could be the scifi citizen kane, with robots.....

And after the animated film, you can't really complain about killing off characters right at the start

Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 09:19 PM BST #

Agree with comments from James, killing characters in Transformers is nothing new. I'm going knowing that I am getting a CGI-filled metal carnage punctuated with eye-candy in the form of Ms Fox. This isn't going to engage my brain, not many summer blockbusters do. So enjoy for what it is. I know I will.

Posted by Garth K (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 09:49 PM BST
Website: http://www.sfx.co.uk/trackback/sfx/Weblog/film_review_transformers_revenge_of #

I'm still hoping that the third film will have Grimlock and Shockwave (and maybe Carnivac, Bludgeon, and the Wreckers).

Posted by Meddling Monkfish (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 12:16 AM BST #

For some strange reason I'm not shocked by this review. However, I still reckon that I'll be standing in line at the theater...

Posted by Kell Harker (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 12:53 AM BST #

Oh SFX i'm starting to lose faith in you, you really are in danger of having zero taste in decent films. The trailere for this alone deserves 4 stars. I'm off to see this tomorrow and i have no doubt i'm going to love it. As usual i take no notice of reviews, they just look inconsequencial when the movie make shedloads of cash and this one will.

Nuff said.

Posted by LM (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM BST #

Gobots freakin' rule!!!

Posted by bob_jordan (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 01:44 PM BST #

Am I the only one who found Megan Fox's immobile facial expression and lack of warmth annoying in the first film? Apparently so. There's more to acting than being slender, Mr Bay.

Still, at least he hasn't put Nick 'My over-face-lifted head looks like an egg wearing a wig these days' Cage in it.

Yet.

These action scenes better be worthwhile, cos that's why me and the wife are going. (Plus, she loves Bumblebee.)

Posted by Big Boris (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 03:40 PM BST
Website: http://www.heresyminiatures.com #

Hardly surprising that the second film isn't very good. The first was pretty awful too. I'm not against Transformers, but I'm not keen on action movies that move so fast you can't actually tell what's going on half the time.

Posted by Bob (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 04:45 PM BST #

Wow. I wasn't exactly a fan of the first one, but I figured this would be more of the same not the colossally bad movie this review says it is. So much for Michael Bay being consistently awful, it sounds like he hit a new low.

Posted by IGPNicki (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 06:36 PM BST
Website: http://www.igp-scifi.com #

Tony Todd IS The Fallen (apparently). Worth the price of admission alone. :)

Posted by Meddling Monkfish (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 11:47 PM BST #

If I was 11 I imagine I'd think this was the best film ever. Where are the genre films for grown ups?

Posted by EpuurSiMuove (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 08:34 AM BST #

Weel i was right, saw this today and it was fantastic, by far the best thing i've seen this year. Awesome special effects, non stop action and it moves at a quick pace, Didn't feel like over 2 hours. Wrong again SFX, even better than the awesome first film and i can't wait till Transformers 3. The no taste brigade really need to get out more.

5 stars, 10/10

Posted by LM (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM BST #

Can't wait to see it on Wednesday...

Weeeeeeee.

Posted by David Morris (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM BST #

Saw it today, good film, enjoyed it. deserves 3 stars at least 3 and a 1/2 tops
(btw, kicked a guy square in the nuts for tediously clapping all the way through this film, if you dont like the film WALK OUT, dont annoy me and the rest of the paying public just coz you're a no nose twat)

Posted by Interstella5555 (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 06:17 PM BST #

I just seen this movie and I thought it was really good. The action was amazing and there was such an immensely huge storyline that the time just whizzed by. The graphics were amazing which was great considering the amount that was in it.
A Big Thumbs Up From Me.

Posted by crazyisgood (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 11:37 PM BST #

Well, I didn't want to agree with your review Richard... but I've just come back from seeing this and 2 1/2 stars sounds about right. Maybe I would have given it 3 but your final paragraph sums up my feelings nicely.

I LOVED the first film, really wasn't expecting to but ended up seeing it twice at the cinema and countless times on dvd. This sequel definitely lacked something. I know the first wasn't perfect, but at least it was fun, and never took itself too seriously. This one seemed content in keeping the humour strictly juvenile and filling the action sequences with as much cheesy predictability as possible.

Yes I still enjoyed it, but it definitely felt like Bay went the route of "Lets make the sequel 10 times more explosive than the last one. That is all"

Posted by Pete (127.0.0.1) on June 20, 2009 at 12:56 AM BST #

I know this may sound dumb, but I don't think humour belongs in Transformers. Bay's incredibly poor choice of 'jokes' in the first film spoiled it for me. Watch the original animated series - it's very po-faced, and all the better for it IMO. Sure I laughed as I watched the first Bay movie, albeit slightly nervously and with an ever-increasing sense that my very favourite thing from my childhood was being somehow mocked and belittled. Repeated watchings have only increased this feeling. Now we have this sequel - which I've not yet seen - and already I'm dreading a further descent into broad comedy. Annoying buzzing and chirping Lucas-esque robots, pratfalls, urinating robots, modern 'lingo', pop-culture references...sigh. Poor Transformers. It didn't deserve this. It's not Shakespeare, but it means something to me. Michael Bay is a talentless hack, Megan Fox a pouting orange-faced barbie-doll, Shia the Beef a prattling buffoon...what's to like? Oh yeah...the gloriously rendered giant transforming robots. They're the sole reason to watch these movies. Not for the bullshit window-dressing tacked on as an afterthought. Not for yet another round of sunset shots and endlessly-moving cameras. For Optimus Prime, Megatron and the all the rest of them.
Meanwhile I'll just go watch Transformers the Movie again before taking a deep breath and heading off to the cinema. Gotta do my duty...

Posted by PJ Bottoms (127.0.0.1) on June 20, 2009 at 10:50 PM BST #

"Revenge Of The Fallen is spectacular, funny, cringeworthy, edge-of-the-seat exciting, tedious, incomprehensible, dumb and very occasionally smart – sometimes all at the same time"

And only 2.5?

Most of my friends hated the first one, I loved it. I'll be seeing this on tuesday

Posted by Zarnywoop (127.0.0.1) on June 21, 2009 at 06:06 PM BST #

Just like I expected, the plot decreased even further and effects increased but that's ok with me, I'll be only watching it for the robots!

Posted by cassi (127.0.0.1) on June 22, 2009 at 09:53 AM BST #

the first film was flawed but still very entertaining unfortunately the 2nd film is terrible!!! there is no way transformers 2 deserves 2 and a half stars!! id give it no stars at all !!!!

Posted by will (127.0.0.1) on June 22, 2009 at 05:56 PM BST #

I don't know what happened. Yesterday I seem to have lost about 2 1/2 hours of my life. I think I went into my local cinema to see some film about giant robots or something. A while later I found myself out in the street, blinking in the sunlight, feeling like I'd just been beaten up. My ears were ringing, lights flashed in my eyes, and the taste in my mouth was one of ashes. I had only one thought: Kill Bay...Kill Bay...
Must be something I ate. Anyway, what was this thread about? Oh yeah, Transformers 2....
Woah, I think I just blacked out again. I'm just gonna go lay down for a bit...

Posted by PJ Bottoms (127.0.0.1) on June 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM BST #

I didn't want to believe the reviews, I really didn't but went to see it yesterday and I just could not believe it. How old is bay? It's like it was written by a horny teenager. It's as if he had a bet with his mates to see how much innuendo he could fit into a two and a half hour movie that's supposed be about transforming robots. And those twins?! Please! You know it's bad when you want two of the autobot to die horribly as soon as you meet them.Please give the franchise to someone else and start over.I suppose there's one good thing: now, compared to this piece of filth, the first film seems evene better than it was and all its flaws seem less obvious. Deserves one star for managing to get that script made.

Posted by Chappington (127.0.0.1) on June 25, 2009 at 09:33 AM BST #

I went to see this a couple of days ago. I liked the first Transformers, but this just flat out sucked. It's overlong, bloated, loud, obnoxious and dull.

Some of the action scenes are well done (though the finale was awful, it's borderline impossible to keep track of what was going on in that sequence) but everything else about the movie was awful.

The plot was nonsensical and full of holes you could drive a truck through, the "comic relief" was unfunny and ocassionally offense and there were way too many useless scenes and characters. The film is so long and frantic that it eventually just comes a chore to watch.

Posted by Hal (127.0.0.1) on July 01, 2009 at 09:31 AM BST #

this is the worst sequel since pirates of the carribean2

Posted by will (127.0.0.1) on July 03, 2009 at 02:37 PM BST #

While I don't think it was as bad as some, it definitely lost something from the first film.

I actually think the first half is ok, with a good enough plot (for the kind of film it is) to keep things moving.

But it's the last hour in the desert with that massive fight that really brings it down. It's spectacular and the SFX are amazing, but you just can't follow it and there seems to be no story anymore, just robots, explosions and every imaginable piece of US millitary hardware.

It's a shame, as compared to the cost and difficulty of making it, surely a rudimentary bit of scripting for the last hour wouldn't have cost much but would have hugely improved the film.

Posted by Ian Dudley (127.0.0.1) on July 07, 2009 at 10:51 AM BST #

I think you're being mean. What do you want from a film about robots that walk and talk? Shakespeare? It's got everything the cartoon portrayed and it does it with humour. Loads better than the first one!

Posted by Dan Silenus (127.0.0.1) on July 19, 2009 at 12:41 AM BST
Website: http://www.myspace.com/spekulus #

Theres just two words that explain why this film is the worst film I've seen this year. Robot testicles.

Posted by liam (127.0.0.1) on July 20, 2009 at 09:59 PM BST #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
SFX Movie Trailers

Calendar