FILM REVIEW: Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen
|
12A • 150 mins • 19 June Director: Michael Bay Cast: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, John Turturro, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Ramon Rodriguez, Rainn Wilson, Isabel Lucas Rating: For years Michael Bay’s been aspiring to take cinema to a place where action is punctuated as rarely as possible by those pesky talky bits. With his big, loud and slightly nonsensical Transformers sequel he’s taken his quest to its logical conclusion. This is effectively one big, two-and-a-half-hour-long set-piece. From a Shanghai-based mash-up that out-bangs the first movie’s finale, through to a robot rumble in tourist-friendly sight of the pyramids of Giza, there’s barely time to catch your breath, let alone think. This film is so eager to give your senses a pummelling that come the end, your mind is completely anaesthetised to the outside world. The story is something of an afterthought, which is a shame, considering that, for all its crazy excess, the first Transformers did at least have a clear beginning, middle and end. Here the plot doesn’t so much unfold as materialise from the ether. New robot characters appear from nowhere, key plot points slip in and out of the movie on a whim – you’re often left thinking “so what happened to [insert relevant item]?”– and inescapable situations are frequently resolved by revealing a convenient new piece of Transformer technology. In the tradition of blockbuster sequels, the bywords here are “bigger, faster, more intense”. It’s now three years since the events of the original movie, and Optimus Prime and his Autobot buddies – their ranks now swelled by a few new robots in disguise – are working with the US government to track down and eliminate rogue Decepticons. Unfortunately for Prime and co, Megatron’s lackeys are working overtime to prepare for the return of the Fallen, an ancient robot Lucifer who’s like the Emperor to Megatron’s Darth Vader (contrary to reports, Megatron is in the movie, his watery grave revealed to the Decepticons by a piece of expositionary dialogue so shameless that all involved should have been sent back to film school). As you’d expect, the robots look fantastic. ILM’s effects have moved on even since their groundbreaking work on the first movie, and their giant shapeshifting machines are so integrated with the real world that you feel Michael Bay just picked up a camera and shot them. Even so, you can’t help feeling that less could have been more. Aside from the colourful Optimus Prime, Bumblebee and newbie Autobot comic relief/annoyances The Twins, there are so many identikit, silvery Transformers that they blur into one, many of them glimpsed so fleetingly – a couple die in the opening salvo – that their only reason for existence is as an excuse to sell toys. Had Bay cut the roll call back a bit, they might have been characters rather than flag-bearers for CGI. The one Bot to emerge with personality intact is curmudgeonly geriatric Decepticon turncoat Jetfire, a creaky British-accented misanthrope whose utterance of the word “bollocks” is almost worth the admission by itself. However, Bay’s no longer just about machines. These days he has a new fixation in the shapely form of Megan Fox. The first movie’s infamous car repair scene opened some major floodgates, and now the director never misses an opportunity to get his starlet du jour running in slow motion, pouting at the camera or provocatively removing bits of clothing. You’re looking at the fine line where modelling meets acting. If Megan Fox’s attributes are used to the max – she’s so alluring that even robots try humping her leg – her co-star/love interest Shia LaBeouf is somewhat wasted. Made miserable, Luke Skywalker-style, by the weight of the world on his shoulders, Sam Witwicky’s fast-talking wit doesn’t appear much beyond the first act. Instead, the lion’s share of the comedy falls to John Turturro’s bitter ex-government agent and Sam’s irritating new college roommate Leo (The Wire’s Ramon Rodriguez). Like the movie as a whole, the results are inconsistent. By turns Revenge Of The Fallen is spectacular, funny, cringeworthy, edge-of-the-seat exciting, tedious, incomprehensible, dumb and very occasionally smart – sometimes all at the same time. Unfortunately, there isn’t room for everything Bay wants to do in 150 minutes, leaving you wondering why he couldn’t have saved something for a part three. It’s not like any force in the world, robot or human, is going to stop it from happening. Richard Edwards |















Posted by Pete (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 05:12 PM BST #
Posted by Dawfydd (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 05:45 PM BST #
Obviously more of a Gobots fan.
I'll wait and see it myself before getting worked up about the bad vibes.
Posted by Son Of Solo (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 06:44 PM BST #
I'm quite looking forward to seeing it. Nothing like some giant robot Bayhem to lighten my mood.
Posted by Hal (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 07:02 PM BST #
Posted by John Purnell (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 07:27 PM BST #
Posted by Poekie Poek (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 09:16 PM BST #
And after the animated film, you can't really complain about killing off characters right at the start
Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 09:19 PM BST #
Posted by Garth K (127.0.0.1) on June 17, 2009 at 09:49 PM BST
Website: http://www.sfx.co.uk/trackback/sfx/Weblog/film_review_transformers_revenge_of #
Posted by Meddling Monkfish (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 12:16 AM BST #
Posted by Kell Harker (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 12:53 AM BST #
Nuff said.
Posted by LM (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM BST #
Posted by bob_jordan (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 01:44 PM BST #
Still, at least he hasn't put Nick 'My over-face-lifted head looks like an egg wearing a wig these days' Cage in it.
Yet.
These action scenes better be worthwhile, cos that's why me and the wife are going. (Plus, she loves Bumblebee.)
Posted by Big Boris (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 03:40 PM BST
Website: http://www.heresyminiatures.com #
Posted by Bob (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 04:45 PM BST #
Posted by IGPNicki (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 06:36 PM BST
Website: http://www.igp-scifi.com #
Posted by Meddling Monkfish (127.0.0.1) on June 18, 2009 at 11:47 PM BST #
Posted by EpuurSiMuove (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 08:34 AM BST #
5 stars, 10/10
Posted by LM (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM BST #
Weeeeeeee.
Posted by David Morris (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM BST #
(btw, kicked a guy square in the nuts for tediously clapping all the way through this film, if you dont like the film WALK OUT, dont annoy me and the rest of the paying public just coz you're a no nose twat)
Posted by Interstella5555 (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 06:17 PM BST #
A Big Thumbs Up From Me.
Posted by crazyisgood (127.0.0.1) on June 19, 2009 at 11:37 PM BST #
I LOVED the first film, really wasn't expecting to but ended up seeing it twice at the cinema and countless times on dvd. This sequel definitely lacked something. I know the first wasn't perfect, but at least it was fun, and never took itself too seriously. This one seemed content in keeping the humour strictly juvenile and filling the action sequences with as much cheesy predictability as possible.
Yes I still enjoyed it, but it definitely felt like Bay went the route of "Lets make the sequel 10 times more explosive than the last one. That is all"
Posted by Pete (127.0.0.1) on June 20, 2009 at 12:56 AM BST #
Meanwhile I'll just go watch Transformers the Movie again before taking a deep breath and heading off to the cinema. Gotta do my duty...
Posted by PJ Bottoms (127.0.0.1) on June 20, 2009 at 10:50 PM BST #
And only 2.5?
Most of my friends hated the first one, I loved it. I'll be seeing this on tuesday
Posted by Zarnywoop (127.0.0.1) on June 21, 2009 at 06:06 PM BST #
Posted by cassi (127.0.0.1) on June 22, 2009 at 09:53 AM BST #
Posted by will (127.0.0.1) on June 22, 2009 at 05:56 PM BST #
Must be something I ate. Anyway, what was this thread about? Oh yeah, Transformers 2....
Woah, I think I just blacked out again. I'm just gonna go lay down for a bit...
Posted by PJ Bottoms (127.0.0.1) on June 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM BST #
Posted by Chappington (127.0.0.1) on June 25, 2009 at 09:33 AM BST #
Some of the action scenes are well done (though the finale was awful, it's borderline impossible to keep track of what was going on in that sequence) but everything else about the movie was awful.
The plot was nonsensical and full of holes you could drive a truck through, the "comic relief" was unfunny and ocassionally offense and there were way too many useless scenes and characters. The film is so long and frantic that it eventually just comes a chore to watch.
Posted by Hal (127.0.0.1) on July 01, 2009 at 09:31 AM BST #
Posted by will (127.0.0.1) on July 03, 2009 at 02:37 PM BST #
I actually think the first half is ok, with a good enough plot (for the kind of film it is) to keep things moving.
But it's the last hour in the desert with that massive fight that really brings it down. It's spectacular and the SFX are amazing, but you just can't follow it and there seems to be no story anymore, just robots, explosions and every imaginable piece of US millitary hardware.
It's a shame, as compared to the cost and difficulty of making it, surely a rudimentary bit of scripting for the last hour wouldn't have cost much but would have hugely improved the film.
Posted by Ian Dudley (127.0.0.1) on July 07, 2009 at 10:51 AM BST #
Posted by Dan Silenus (127.0.0.1) on July 19, 2009 at 12:41 AM BST
Website: http://www.myspace.com/spekulus #
Posted by liam (127.0.0.1) on July 20, 2009 at 09:59 PM BST #