SFX
SFX Merchandise
Newsletter

20090107 Wednesday January 07, 2009

FILM REVIEW: The Spirit



12A • 102 mins • 1 January

Director: Frank Miller

Cast: Gabriel Macht, Samuel L Jackson, Eva Mendes, Scarlett Johansson

Rating:

“My city screams,” declares the domino-masked crimefighter. But that’s not the sound of a metropolis in torment. That’s the restless spectre of comic book legend Will Eisner, rightly appalled by what Frank Miller has done to his baby.

Oh, Miller may talk up his reverence for his old friend’s work, but from the pseudo-Sin City opening, all stark monochrome and snow, it’s obvious that he’s determined to stamp, no, jackboot, his vision on this project. It’s the same creative presumption that sees him bin the hero’s immortal blue suit for a black number, a sin against iconhood as daft as dressing Superman in mauve.

But Miller doesn’t only stumble on four-colour aesthetics. Somehow he misses the entire heart of Eisner’s canon. The original Spirit tales were humanitarian fables of fate and redemption, the struggles of deadbeat souls seen with a wise, warm eye. There are no human beings in Miller’s city, no little people. He populates it with a circus of grotesques, from Samuel L Jackson’s gun-toting, mascara-eyed villain to Eve Mendes’s bling-obssessed femme fatale.

Where Eisner specialised in a silky, smoky sense of noir erotica, Miller deals in simple kink. There’s an unsubtle, faintly creepy salaciousness here. Women become dolls draped with Miller’s fetishes, from the Times Square-hooker look to Nazi exploitation chic. Even the Spirit doesn’t escape a whiff of misplaced perversity: “The city is my sweetheart, my plaything,” he tells us, with the lascivious rasp of a man who frots himself against fire hydrants when no-one is looking.

Sure, it’s a gorgeous looking film, if wearyingly so. The cinematography is sublime, and Miller’s a talented enough stylist to deliver little sunbursts of sudden beauty – the Spirit’s childhood sweetheart walks away into a frame of pure, bold scarlet and it’s breathtaking. But no amount of flash can camouflage the career-low performances, the scaffolding where characterisation should be, the pitiful cod ‘40s dialogue or the monstrously fumbled comedy. Jackson wallops the Spirit with a urinal seat then cries “Toilets are always funny!” – if you’ve ever wondered what humour sounds like in the icy vacuum of space, now’s your chance.

Nick Setchfield

Advertisement
Trackback URL:
Comments:

Saw it on Monday, very disappointing. Almost left at one point as it just seemed to be taking the p*ss, SinCity it ain't, it's not even a Sky Captain. The story seemed all over the place, the less said about the acting the better, even the times where they aeemed to be playin up the bad acting, it was bad. My advive, save your money and buy and extra big popcorn and drink, maybe some malteasers when Sin City 2 arrives

Posted by David (127.0.0.1) on January 07, 2009 at 06:01 PM GMT #

It fails The Spirit horridly but the films enjoyable to watch, if you can enjoy camp OTT pulp action.

Posted by igniz13 (127.0.0.1) on January 07, 2009 at 09:32 PM GMT
Website: http://forum.sfx.co.uk #

As a film it is a miserable failure. However, as another experiment in art (after Sin City and 300) it stands up pretty well.

I'll guess this will get some Oscar noms for SFX and perhaps even cinematography, but otherwise it will be forgotten asap.

Posted by Scurra (127.0.0.1) on January 07, 2009 at 09:48 PM GMT #

An enjoyable couple of hours was spent at the cinema watching this but had I been looking for The Spirit, I didn't find it in this film.

Posted by Keith (127.0.0.1) on January 07, 2009 at 10:59 PM GMT #

Aaaargh! Why? 'The Spirit' is justly celebrated as one of the most ground-breaking comics of all time and so much more than the pumped up pulp this sounds like. While one story would be pure noir, the next would be closer to screwball comedy, and all shot through with will Eisner's wisdom and warmth. I just hope that if nothing else, it prompts a few people to discover the magic of the original comics themselves.
It's also not that well known outside of comic book circles, so why didn't Frank Miller just create his own character to indulge his frankly troubling fetishes?

Posted by David Lemon (127.0.0.1) on January 08, 2009 at 04:26 PM GMT
Website: http://www.jetpacksandsuch.blogspot.com #

*whispers* I actually really enjoyed it
although notihing like the original

Posted by The fool (127.0.0.1) on January 08, 2009 at 08:07 PM GMT
Website: http://www.myspace.com/a_past_and_future_secret #

Having never heard of the comic, I was let's say less than intrigued. And then I saw the trailer, and virtually ignored it.
Based solely on the trailer- meant to DRAW people in to see the film- I was repelled by the prospect of what looked like a very artistic, comic book porn film. Is there anyone this guy doesn't screw in this movie?
I might be tempted when it hits terrestrial or the bargain bucket DVD shelves, but til then... meh.

Posted by Bobcat (127.0.0.1) on January 09, 2009 at 04:53 PM GMT #

Two stars?
No, no, no...
Two stars is mediocre. Two stars is dull. Two stars may even be vaguely passable. This is not a two star film.
This was a straight up and down one star stinker.
This was Battlefield Earth Bad.
Yeah. I said it.
And I ain't taking it back.

Posted by Neil (127.0.0.1) on January 15, 2009 at 09:08 PM GMT #

This wasn't even 1 star. I'll admit to be suffering the beginings of flu when I watched it which ment that I mearly thought I'd had a fever induced hallucination when Samuel L Payingtherent (sorry, Jackson) came out dressed as a Nazi. It was only when my friend leaned over and asked why he was dressed this way did I sit up and look for my brain which was making for the exit. If Millar wasn't involved I'd have said the director was trying to ride Sin City's coat tails if a few years late. I think I'd have had a more enjoyable cinema experience going through the Ludovico Technique than wathcing this waste of film

Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on January 31, 2009 at 05:51 PM GMT #

Unfortunately, I gotta agree review . I even think it's a little kind.

It's a god damn awful movie. I walked out at when the Spirit smiled into the camera after telling the kids to visit the dentist! It's the only movie where I've ever left the cinema. I want my money - and the time I wasted on it - back

Posted by Andrew (127.0.0.1) on February 01, 2009 at 10:10 PM GMT #

I have to admit, just the very idea of Samuel L Jackson dressed as a Nazi is so hilarious it might actually redeem the whole film.

'Hey, kids, forget this watered-down, comics-for-people-who-are-too-scared-to-read-actual-comics bobbins - here's Snakes On A Plane Bloke dressed up as a Nazi! No wait, come back - that's not the only good bit... Scarlett Johansson's cleavage! As per usual! Come back! It's the genius of Frank Miller!'

Brilliant! I'm sure it's rubbish, but I'm off to the cinema right now to punish myself! Who needs rigid adherence to the source material? It's guaranteed to be at least much better than 300! And perhaps just a tiny bit less gay!

Posted by spiderboris (127.0.0.1) on March 14, 2009 at 02:24 AM GMT
Website: http://televisionoff.blogspot.com #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
SFX Movie Trailers

Calendar