SFX
SFX Merchandise
Newsletter

20090811 Tuesday August 11, 2009

FILM REVIEW: GI Joe: The Rise Of Cobra


12A • 117 mins • 12 August

Director: Stephen Sommers

Cast: Channing Tatum, Marlon Wayans, Rachel Nichols, Sinenna Miller, Christopher Eccelston, Ray Park

Rating:

Another week, another movie of the cartoon of the comic of the Hasbro toy line. This one’s by Stephen Sommers, blatantly going for another zillion-dollar franchise after The Mummy movies and, um, Van Helsing. No surprises, then? Well, whisper it, but GI Joe’s rather fun.

The plot is a game of soldiers. Trooper buddies Duke (Channing Tatum, recently seen as gangster Pretty Boy Floyd in Public Enemies) and Ripcord (Marlon Wayans) are transporting a military nano-technology (it eats metal), when they come under air-attack from baddie organisation COBRA. Think SPECTRE from James Bond, with a metal-masked supremo and a Scottish henchman played by – It isn’t! It is! – a slumming-it Christopher Eccleston. To his dismay, Duke sees an old flame (Sienna Miller) with the bad guys. Soon he and Ripcord have signed up with an elite military unit, GI Joe, whose main toy is a cheesy speed-up suit that lets soldiers rush about like Speedy Gonzales.

Okay, so it’s dumb and dopey, with plenty of bumpy bits, some shonky CGI (do we sense another effects rush-job to hit the release date?) while director Sommers wouldn’t know a human nuance if it exploded up his tailpipe. But coming after Michael Bay’s terrifyingly psychotic Transformers sequel, it’s a relief to have a lowbrow fantasy actioner that’s lively and busy without being crushingly relentless. You have to forgive it a lot, including a silly Paris sequence in which zipping metal dolls have loads of cars chucked at them. But GI Joe has a genuine cliffhanger charm, especially when the last act becomes a whole string of pulp plot twists. The ending screams “To Be Continued”; we could do worse.

Andrew Osmond

Advertisement
Trackback URL:
Comments:

Oddly enough,I saw it last night, and I agree completely. It's bonkers, very silly, and struck me as if I was watching a very VERY expensive cartoon. Yet, it was thoroughly entertaining brain-deactivating fun, and sometimes thats exactly what you need!

Posted by Lord Dannos (127.0.0.1) on August 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM BST #

Good to see there are some sci fi publications (unlike Sci Fi Now) who haven't forgotten how to have a good time at the cinemas. I saw it on Saturday and have to say your review got it spot on.

Posted by ChrisSmyth (127.0.0.1) on August 11, 2009 at 12:07 PM BST #

The films enjoyable enough but since Team America was made this just seems like a live action verison of it, but without the intention of being funny or a satire.

One small point of anoyance in the film though... Why was the preseident of America British! Johnathn Price didn't even try to do an American acent.

Posted by Mr Kleason (127.0.0.1) on August 11, 2009 at 12:28 PM BST #

Can't be any worse than Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen, I suppose.

Posted by Hal (127.0.0.1) on August 12, 2009 at 02:42 AM BST #

Just saw this today.

I think I'm going to give it a B minus, which fits three stars rather well, I think. First two thirds were quite enjoyable for me (and the fight in The Pit was very much so due to a certain comic homage). Last third (starting with the Paris chase) were a bit much is places. Just come from a long dinner with work types now and a bit tired, but more when I can digest this a bit.

Overall, better than I expected.

Posted by Laura Mc (127.0.0.1) on August 12, 2009 at 03:56 AM BST #

A dumb big action movie, but then that what was expected and that's what you got. Good Fun, 3 stars is about right, though frankly there is no excuse these days for bad CGI so that was disappointing.

no where near as good as Transformers Revenge of the Fallen but as i said Good fun.

Posted by OMG!!! (127.0.0.1) on August 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM BST #

i havent seen it but im glad sfx liked it and i will definately go see this sci fi now i agree are very negative about films

Posted by rhys (127.0.0.1) on August 12, 2009 at 08:50 PM BST #

I'm gonna go see this when I get the chance, mainly for Christopher Eccleston and Ray Park, two of my favourite actors.

What I'd really like to know, though, is when do we get to see MASK?

If any 80s show can make a mark in today's climate, Mobile Armoured Strike Kommand's battle against the Vicious Evil Network of Mayhem can.

Unfortunately, any movie adaptation is likely to involve miscast actors driving the wrong vehicles. And while many of the vehicles are plausible, I doubt they could do a flying Camaro properly.

Posted by Bobcat (127.0.0.1) on August 13, 2009 at 10:16 AM BST #

OMG a MASK movie would be amazing! as long as it's done right and not so comedy value as GI Joe.

Posted by Mr Kleason (127.0.0.1) on August 13, 2009 at 04:27 PM BST #

Surprisingly not bad! To be honest I have a soft spot for Stephen Sommers' movies, ever since I saw the Mummy as kid. GI Joe is in a similar vein, just good old fashioned, fun. I think its a better movie than Transformers 2, which I think should have been an hour shorter, there was nothing there to justify that kind of running time.

Posted by Moe (127.0.0.1) on August 13, 2009 at 07:06 PM BST #

My partner and I went to see this and I was the one that didn’t fall asleep! It must the one of the worst movies ever and that is 2 hours plus of my time I could have spent washing the dishes or something.

Wait for the DVD and get drunk watching it – it can only help.

Oh Chirs E, why why why?????????

Posted by who-ray! (127.0.0.1) on September 02, 2009 at 08:11 PM BST
Website: http://shop.who-ray.co.uk #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
SFX Movie Trailers

Calendar