Are you looking forward to the new Star Trek movie? What about the Caprica story set before Battlestar Galactica? We are, but not every prequel is welcome - here blogger Steven Gaythorpe discusses phenomenon:
The Problem with Prequels
I cannot be the only person who shudders at the announcement of a new TV series or movie that's a prequel to a much loved classic.
I blame George Lucas, but then I blame him for a lot of things.
Prequels are the new sequels. For decades we were beset with a slew of pointless and painful sequels - X Men: The Last Stand plus The Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions are three that disgrace my DVD collection.
In my opinion prequels are worse than sequels because they pervert the narrative journey of a character. The narrative journey is how characters get from the beginning of their story to the end. When you create a story you are supposed to select the most significant and interesting event in a characters life and write about that. So a prequel is just a story the writer didn’t think was interesting enough tell the first time.
When a TV series or movie has narrative closure, you may think this would only negate the need for a sequel, but I believe it ends the need for a prequel.
I love Battlestar Galactica, but I feel that Caprica could be kind of Pointless: how can you build up a relationship with characters you know are going to die! Okay, everyone dies eventually - but with fictional characters you hope that at the end of the story they will live happily ever after… then die later. OK not realistic for something from the BSG stable. Maybe I’m put off by the fact that the images I have seen so far make it look a bit LA Law!
JJ Abrams' reboot of Star Trek is a prequel that proves the rule, although we have seen various members of the crew die, live on, or reappear in peculiar transporter accidents, the story of the Enterprise never really ended; we never, as an audience, achieved closure, we never had a collective climax. So it’s not a prequel in the true sense, more of a “here’s one I made earlier”.
And in closing, two things: I Am Legend Prequel, The Thing Prequel. I rest my case.
Let the world know how you feel about reboots, reimagingins and prequels in the comments thread below! What's the worst example you can think of?
"I am your Father"
and think 'yeah? We're known that for 3 films'
Posted by Penguin of Death (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 11:35 AM GMT #
Besides, it's a moot point really as the whole Star Wars mythology is so ingrained in the popular psyche that it's very likely that kids know even before they watch the films!
Posted by Allansky (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 12:30 PM GMT #
Well done, Steven, an interesting first blog.
Posted by Kevin M, Wilmington (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 12:35 PM GMT #
What's your case? That you can see into the future?
Posted by Thing (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 01:41 PM GMT #
Well that covers up for the amount of cock ups and mistakes in the movie and that's just in the trailer. If it's not our Kirk, Spock, McCoy etc then what's the point of the film exactly?????
As tge reviewer said above talking about Caprica, that and this are really pointless.
As a big Star Wars fan and one who saw the originals in 1977, 1980 and 1983 i have no problems with the prequels, in fact i loved them. As the success of these films and the recent hit series 'The Clone Wars' proves, Star Wars is as popular and successful as ever and rightly so. Please stop banging on about 'the prequels ruin my childhood' rubbish. frankly thes criticisms are irrelevant.
Posted by OMG!!! (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 01:50 PM GMT #
Perhaps you men "J. J. Abrams."
C'mon. This is supposed to be a professional news site, not an amateur blog. A little copyediting, please.
Posted by greg (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 03:17 PM GMT #
This is a personal blog by one of our volunteer contributors, and we try to edit their contributions as little as possible. I've dipped back in now and corrected the mistyped name, well spotted.
Posted by Dave Bradley (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 04:52 PM GMT
Website: http://tinyurl.com/7v9lhj #
Oh, for an edit button!
Posted by greg (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 07:09 PM GMT #
Posted by Hels (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 09:17 PM GMT #
Posted by Hugh Jass (127.0.0.1) on March 03, 2009 at 10:25 PM GMT #
People spend ridiculous amounts of money on clothing labels, food (i.e. dining venue) labels, drink labels, lifestyle labels.
Ultimately the tag anyone attaches to anything should really boil down to the quality of the product. Some high-class labels are such because their end product is outstanding.
When it comes to movies, books, (the sporn-of-the-devil-term) francises, as with anything else, whatever title is placed upon it should not detract from its reality.
One can 'quel all one likes. The real questions are:
Do you like it and do you enjoy it? If so, then it has value.
Everything else is merely superfluous.
Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on March 04, 2009 at 01:27 AM GMT #
all sequels, in various time-lines. A sequential, consequential procession of storytelling
Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on March 04, 2009 at 01:35 AM GMT #
Posted by Hels (127.0.0.1) on March 04, 2009 at 08:07 AM GMT #
As for the new Star Wars film, i'm not sure! I will go into watch it with an open mind, as you have to take into account it's based on the same characters, but they will never be able to compleatly recreated what was done b4.
I think if people go into a prequel or a remake they should always keep an open mind, so they give the film they are seeing a chance.
Posted by Movie Lover (127.0.0.1) on March 09, 2009 at 12:55 PM GMT
Website: http://portablemediaconnection.com/ #